Edinburgh labelled a dump?
"Phew! I think we dodged another bullet there? What do you think?"
That may be the reaction in Edinburgh Council to an article by an Edinburgh University academic that examines some unpalatable aspects and failures about the way the city has been run and the effects of these systemic governance failures now emerging across the city.
The original article by Richard Williams, Prof of contemporary visual cultures at Edinburgh Uni, in one of the world's leading intellectual magazines Foreign Policy, pulled together many of the strands of things that have undoubtedly gone wrong in Edinburgh in recent years.
But what may have been a wounding attack on the City Council's culture of complacency turned into a bit of a pie chucking contest between Yes and No sides of the independence debate in the Sunday herald follow up, and has the effect turning the spotlight from the realities listed in the article onto it's place in a supposed list of articles covertly dissing Scotland's fitness for independence.
And in doing so possibly letting the Council off the hook as their last 15 or 20 years of misfiring governance has had far more to do with creating the mess the city is now facing than anything done in London or anywhere else.
While looking at issues through the prism of the Independence debate the original Foreign Policy article is an interesting and valid take on ithe fact that the manifest, (and many), planning failures going back over more than a decade have left the city in a worse place than it was 20 years ago, and facing an extremely uncertain future.
The fact is that the contininuing state of denial that exists in Edinburgh isn't an 'Edinburgh' phenomenon, a Scottish phenomenon or even a UK or 'Unionist' one. It's a wider crisis that is exposing faultlines in organisations that we all thought were shining examples of liberal (small L) western democracy but that suddenly appear to have morphed into box ticking, self serving bureaucracies almost while nobody was looking.
Perhaps we, along with the Health Trusts, Food standards managers, Bankers, Journalists, MPs, and Councils were all too busy counting up how much our homes, offices and properties were 'making' in the boom years to bother worrying about boring things such as the fitness for purpose of the agents of democratic process upon which the whole system ultimately depends.
But while many areas of malfunctioning and misfiring democracy are finally, albeit slowly, being opened up to the cleansing disinfectant of public gaze and open debate, in Edinburgh our Council continues to exist in a world of denial, spin and dissembling about the way in which decisions are arrived at and what 'consultation' and 'engagement' are actually meant to achieve,.
Some of the realities for the city of treating 'engagement' and 'consultation' as sterile box ticking for far too long are brought to light in the article.
Try excising the 'Inde slant' to the story and read it as an expose of big ideas a plenty, but all too often accompanied by woeful planning and worse execution.
And if you have time read the comments by Alison Low and Steve McKay ..... especially if you happen to be a councillor in Edinburgh!